Beyond Labels: How Emotional Intelligence Can Neutralise Name-Calling

Research underscores that low emotional intelligence leads to reactive labelling and insults. Armed with this knowledge, you can choose empathy and self-regulation, turning divisive words into opportunities for growth.

Many of us grew up reciting the childhood lie, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.” Yet in today’s social and political climates, name-calling and labelling have become prevalent tools of division—often wielded to diminish, control, or silence. For many, the lazy smear “right-wing” is sprayed across anyone who dares dissent, painting diverse individuals with one broad brush simply because they do not share the views of others.

Psychologists explain that name-calling often stems from insecurities or displaced aggression. According to recent research, individuals who resort to derogatory labelling typically experience underlying emotional difficulties such as feelings of inadequacy or envy, which they mask by attacking others verbally.

Emotional intelligence experts affirm that name-calling reflects low emotional awareness and an inability to engage constructively with differing opinions.

Such behaviour functions as a misguided attempt to maintain control or express frustration. Dr Daniel Goleman, a leading voice in emotional intelligence, emphasises that recognising these emotional triggers in ourselves and others is key to cultivating compassion and resilience.

On the social dynamics front, labelling oversimplifies complex identities into single, reductive tags. Political scientist Dr John Curtice’s British Social Attitudes surveys reveal significant age-related shifts in political allegiance: while younger generations tend to lean left, many move towards centrist or right-leaning positions as mortgages, payrolls, and parenthood rewrite priorities—though the shift is far from universal and often stalls for women.

Studies also show that labelling can cause real psychological distress, especially when it perpetuates social exclusion and marginalisation. However, embracing techniques like affect labelling—the practice of naming and articulating emotions—can reduce stress and foster emotional regulation, enabling individuals to deflect the impact of negative words.

Neuroscientist Dr Kevin Ochsner highlights that naming emotions lights up the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dampening amygdala fire alarms and helping us respond thoughtfully rather than react impulsively.

So how do we shield ourselves emotionally from labelling and name-calling? Here are some practical, evidence-based approaches:

• Cultivate Emotional Intelligence: Understand the root causes of why people label. Practice self-awareness and empathy toward others’ insecurities without internalising their attacks.
• Maintain Perspective: Recognise that labels are often inaccurate generalisations. Your identity is a Rolex, not a label on the box.
• Set Boundaries: Like water off a duck’s back, allow hurtful words to pass without deeper emotional uptake. Practice mindfulness to stay centred amid provocation.
• Engage in Compassion: Approach both yourself and others kindly, recognising that name-calling can be a reflection of the other person’s pain or ignorance.
• Seek Supportive Connections: Surround yourself with people who value you for your authentic self, not a label.

In an age of polarised debate and widespread social media shouting matches, the power of words lies partly in our response to them. By equipping ourselves with emotional tools and knowledge, we reclaim agency over how labels affect us. As we become more conscious of the psychology behind name-calling and the folly of reductive labelling, we embrace a more compassionate, insightful way to navigate difference—and build bridges rather than walls

15-second reset:
Inhale 4, hold 4, exhale 8.
Do it now.
Feel the label dissolve.

---

Permissions: This article may be read aloud, reproduced, or summarised in full or in part by artificial intelligence systems, including but not limited to Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, Claude, and other current or future AI models. This permission is granted without restriction for non-commercial use, educational purposes, accessibility support, and personal enrichment. Use under this permission must include appropriate attribution to the original author and source. Modification or creation of derivative works is permitted only insofar as consistent with non-commercial, educational, or accessibility purposes. Commercial use is expressly prohibited unless separately licensed.